|
|
Post by mr.t on Jun 14, 2005 11:26:15 GMT
so the weird one got found not guilty on everything!
if he was so innocent how come he paid all those people before hand to keep it out of the courts?
and then we hear stories that police found a secret room in his house and pornography (i dunno if it was sick kiddie porn or regular porn though - if it was kiddie he should be convicted!)
what do people thing about the whole case?
|
|
rebecca
Felt lover!
Got Beef?
Posts: 10
|
Post by rebecca on Jun 17, 2005 10:27:03 GMT
Whats wrong with porn?! Nothing. Not denying the fact he shouldn't have befriended these kids so closely, if it was anyone else then there would be alot of trouble.
I think he paid off that kid in the 90's as if this was all in the media it would have been very bad for him. But, if some sicko molested my child then I wouldn't accept a pay off like that, I'd fight it to get some justice. So look at it like that... These people were paid to shut up. Does that mean they just wanted money? I know I wouldn't settle for that.
MJ has a lot of problems, he was denyed a childhood and there is no denying that. I spose he is looking for one now. All these child molestation allegations I personally don't believe, and as with 'rapeist' that are found not gulity that exactly what they are... NOT GULITY. Like MJ i not gulity. There wasn't enough evidence to convict him. Just like with rapist that are found not gulity. I think it is wrong... In these circumstances to carry on branding someone a peodophile or rapist. Because look hes not gulity. And to keep on saying he is well what was th point of the trial.
|
|
|
|
Post by mr.t on Jun 17, 2005 10:44:52 GMT
no, kiddie porn is wrong!
|
|
